[8:09]<zumbrunn> good morning hannesw__ [8:09]<zumbrunn> (delayed reaction from yesterday) ;-) [8:09]<hannesw__> hi chris [8:10]<hannesw__> :-) [8:10]<hannesw__> did you notice the helma.org updates page got faster? [8:10]<hannesw__> http://dev.helma.org/updates/ [8:11]<zumbrunn> I noticed it is fast, anyway, yes! [8:11]<hannesw__> i updated to a new helma 1.7 snapshot yesterday [8:11]<hannesw__> 1.7 rc3 had some bugs, unfortnately [8:11]<hannesw__> but now i'm really really confident :-) [8:12]<zumbrunn> confident as in "time for the *real* release candidate" or confident as in "time to release for real"? [8:13]<hannesw__> both [8:13]<zumbrunn> :-) [8:13]<hannesw__> i reactivated the test suite, and wrote some new tests [8:13]<hannesw__> for large collections [8:13]<hannesw__> and i moved it to modules/test [8:14]<hannesw__> I think I'm finally converted to unit testing [8:14]<hannesw__> First, I couldn't have done the binary/io/file implementations in helma ng without the tests [8:15]<hannesw__> and now it helped a lot with helma 1 collection handling [8:15]<hannesw__> thinking about naming for unit testing now. [8:15]<hannesw__> i really prefer the helma ng names: assertEqual, assertTrue, etc [8:16]<hannesw__> unfortunately, with require, there's no easy way to import these, so you end up with assert.assertEqual(). [8:16]<hannesw__> blargh. [8:16]<zumbrunn> yes, that will get my +1 [8:17]<zumbrunn> (regarding the commonjs unit testing spec) [8:18]<zumbrunn> the closest thing we currently have to a 1.7 change log is this here, right? http://dev.helma.org/wiki/New+features+in+Helma+1.7/ [8:19]<hannesw__> yes, i guess... [8:19]<zumbrunn> will have to go through the commit messages [8:19]<hannesw__> and that: [8:19]<hannesw__> http://dev.helma.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Helma&target_milestone=1.7.0&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&orde [8:19]<hannesw__> r=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= [8:20]<hannesw__> (bugs with target 1.7.0) [8:20]<zumbrunn> oh, yes... that helps, of course