[14:23]<zumbrunn> hi Ace_NoOne [14:23]<Ace_NoOne> hi there [14:23]<Ace_NoOne> remember me, with the licensing question? [14:23]<zumbrunn> I saw you question about the license [14:24]<Ace_NoOne> ahh cool [14:24]<Ace_NoOne> what's the verdict [14:25]<zumbrunn> I didn't write that code, so it isn't really for me to say [14:25]<zumbrunn> I can only give you a general recommendation [14:25]<zumbrunn> and that would be to always retain the original copyright and license information [14:26]<zumbrunn> as long as it is possible to keep the original code separate from your code [14:27]<Ace_NoOne> well, I'm modifying the function anyway - brb [14:28]<zumbrunn> and when that becomes unreasonable, to still mention that it was based on the original work "foo" that was licensed under license "bar" [14:29]<zumbrunn> of course, this is a bit silly if the code you are copying is trivial [14:30]<zumbrunn> but only the copyright holder (or a judge) can decide what is trivial and what isn't [14:34]<Ace_NoOne> it is indeed trivial - just this line: this.setMinutes(this.getMinutes() + this.getTimezoneOffset()); [14:34]<Ace_NoOne> however, I do get your point - do you know who wrote that code? [14:35]<zumbrunn> that's trivial indeed [14:35]<zumbrunn> ...in my opionion ;-) [14:35]<zumbrunn> opinion [14:36]<Ace_NoOne> hehe [14:36]<zumbrunn> not sure [14:36]<zumbrunn> maybe tobi, or someone else at the orf [14:41]<Ace_NoOne> orf? [14:42]<zumbrunn> the austrian broadcasting corporation [14:42]<zumbrunn> http://orf.at/ [14:43]<Ace_NoOne> ahh, ORF [14:43]<zumbrunn> right ;-)